The Government Won´t Make Any Money On This Deal.......

Looks like a "Deja Vu".....Compare this with the news from July ...... They have kicked the can three month down the road ( DESPERATION when you look at the maturity schedule )....... BRAVO! Needless to say that when they received the TARP money CIT were classified as "well capitalised".......If the WSJ & Reuters are correct it is very good news that we finally see the Debt To Equity Swap in a not so small ( see CIT Analyst Presentation ) financial company ....Too bad for CIT that they are not TBTF like Citi ( see yesterdays news Citi is still using FDIC TLGP ) ......

Fühlt sich wie ein Deja Vu an......Vergleicht die heutige Meldung bitte mal mit der vom Juli...... CIT hat es immerhin geschafft sich ganze 3 Monate Luft zu verschaffen ( pure Verzweiflung wenn man einen Blick auf die Fälligkeiten wirft )......BRAVO! Ganz nebenbei bemerkt war CIT zum Zeitpunkt der als die TARP Mrd flossen "well capitalized".....Sollten das WSJ & Reuters richtig liegen bleibt festzuhalten das wir endlich den ersten Debt To Equity Swap in einem nicht ganz kleinen Finanzinstitut ( ein Blick in die CIT Analysten Presentation gibt eine gute Übersicht ) zu sehen bekommen. Dumm für CIT hat sie nicht wie Citi ( siehe gestrige Meldung Citi Still Using FDIC TLGP ) in die Kategorie "Too Big Too Fail" fallen.....

CIT Readies Plan to Hand Control to Bondholders WSJ

Lender Readies Plan to Hand Control to Bondholders; Bankruptcy Filing Is an Option

The fate of CIT Group Inc. was hanging in the balance Tuesday as the large commercial lender readied a plan that would likely hand control of the company to its bondholders.

CIT is preparing a sweeping exchange offer that would eliminate 30% to 40% of its more than $30 billion in debt outstanding, said people familiar with the matter.

The plan would offer bondholders new debt secured by CIT assets, as well as nearly all of the equity in a restructured firm. The new debt would mature later than current debt, the impending maturity of which has posed a problem for CIT.

The plan sets up a potential showdown between bondholders with debt coming due soon and those whose debt does not come due for years. If the company doesn't receive enough bondholder support, it plans to execute the restructuring in bankruptcy court, the people familiar with the situation said.

While the plan is being developed by a steering committee of bondholders in consultation with CIT management, many of those involved said they didn't expect that the company could avoid seeking Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, given competing bondholder interests.

If CIT does file, it would be the fifth-largest bankruptcy filing, by assets, in U.S. history, trailing only Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., Washington Mutual Inc., WorldCom Inc. and General Motors Corp. CIT would continue operating under creditor protection, although other financial businesses have struggled to remain viable in bankruptcy.

CIT declined to comment. The people familiar with the matter cautioned that talks remained fluid and many details remained to be determined, including the amount of debt CIT needed to extinguish to avoid a bankruptcy filing.

Having run out of funding options this summer, given its "junk" credit rating, CIT faced the looming need to roll over debt that was maturing. The firm teetered on the verge of a bankruptcy filing before it got a rescue package in late July.

CIT had sought relief from federal regulators and last December did receive $2.3 billion under the Treasury's Troubled Asset Relief Program.

In 2009, however, federal regulators declined further aid, having determined that a failure by CIT wouldn't severely harm the economy. That left the lender scrambling to right a balance sheet burdened by bad real-estate and commercial loans.

CIT avoided a bankruptcy filing in late July when a group of large bondholders such as Pimco, Oaktree Capital and Silver Point Capital infused $3 billion in last-minute financing. The money acted like a "bridge" for CIT to prepare a debt-exchange offer.

UPDATE via Zero Hedge ( couldn´t resist )

Citi and CIT Are Primed for Upside, by Jim Cramer 9/29/2009, 1:54 PM EDT

....I put both of these up there as examples of companies that won't die, and because they won't die, they live. I know that seems a little circular in reasoning, but because Citigroup never suffered a run like Wachovia and Washington Mutual did, it made it and as our flagship site mentioned, it is safe. If it is safe, it can go higher. Because no one forced CIT into bankruptcy, it can live to play again, and when I read in the New York Post that Paulson owns CIT debt, I realized that he's powerful enough to save this company, particularly because he is one of the investors in IndyMac and knows his way around the bottom of the debt barrel.

These two stocks represent lottery tickets that are no longer rip-ups because they have made it out of the "critical care" stage and are recovering. I would buy them both.

> Nice timing Jim..... Add this expertise to his "Ten Trillion $ Worth Of Good Calls"..... ;-) But after watching the other ZOMBIE stocks ( AIG, FRE, FNM ) spiking higher & considering the market rationale these days it would not surprise me to see the stock move higher..... Stock closed down 45 percent.....

> Autsch......Gelungenes Timing..... Denke dieser Expertenrat reiht sich nathlos an die Reihe der "Ten Trillion $ Worth Of Good Calls" ein..... ;-) Nachdem was ansonsten mit anderen ZOMBIEAKTIEN ( AIG, FRE, FNM, Arcandor, Hypo Real Estate usw ) geschehen ist bzw man die aktuelle Risikobereitschaft berücksichtigt ist nicht ausgeschlossen das selbst diese Meldung noch zu Kurssprüngen führt... Aktie reagiert überraschenderweise mit einem "Abschlag" von 45% vollkommen rational....

CORRECTION: Business Week Cover "Why The Market Will Keep Going Up" / "Why The Market Is Going Nowhere"

Shame on me..... See the correction at the end of the post.....(Original Post) Just in time .....You don´t have to read Why The Market Will Keep Going Up ( i didn´t )to know that this kind of cover comes usually closer to the top...... ;-)

Da habe ich wohl gepennt...... Bitte die alternative Lesart des Covers bei einer 180% Drehung am Ende des Postings beachten...... ( Ursprüngliches Posting) Gerade noch rechtzeitig .......Man muß kein Prophet sein und den Artikel Why The Market Will Keep Going Up gelesen haben ( habe es mir verkniffen ) um zu wissen das diese Art von Cover im Regelfall eher nahe einem Top zu finden ist..... ;-)

H/T Clusterstock

Dow 9.750, S&P 1.060, N100 1.725, DAX 5675, Eurostoxx 2875, Nikkei 10.130

Needless to say that i ´m "less optimistisc" ( see here , here & here)

Brauche wohl nicht zu erwähnen das ich weniger optimistsisch bin ( siehe hier , hier & hier) Sollte nun auch noch der Focus einen ähnlichen Titel machen ist es höchste Zeit short zu gehen...... :-)

CORRECTION : H/T Barry Ritholtz

We're Speaking Japanese Without Knowing It - John Hussman

Good reminder from Hussman that we still havn´t make any meaningful progress with the main issue of all the toxic debt & the impaired bank balance sheets ( click here & here for just a few example )..... He is spot on that it is a scandal that so far the bondholders have been "protected"at the expense of the taxpayer ( rip off still expanding on a daily basis / see The Talf that keeps on taking (CMBS) ,Let’s say RIP to PPIP , Spain to approve EUR 64bln of guarantees for bank debt sales & "Today I Think Of Myself As A Government Contractor......" etc.) ...... The Great "Cover-Up" is still in full force without significant consequences for the "participants"........" Where is the debt to equity swap ?"

Schön zu sehen das es zumindest noch einzelne Rufer in der Wüste wie Hussman gibt die sich erlauben darauf hinzuweisen das der wichtigste Punkt der Krise, die sich unter Wasser befindlichen Bankenbilanzen, noch immer nicht mal ansatzweise gelöst worden ist ( Hier & hier nur einige Beispiele ). Unglücklicherweise ist die Lage in Deutschland ebenfalls nach wie vor "instabil" siehe Oppenheim verpfändet Aktien & Neues Milliardenloch bei LBBW ) ........ Es ist gelinde gesagt ein Skandal das praktisch weltweit die Politik in Verbindung mit den Notenbanken entschieden hat die Anleiheinvestoren zu schützen und stattdessen den Steuerzahler in Risiko gehen zu lassen ( verweise stellvertretend auf The Talf that keeps on taking (CMBS) , Let’s say RIP to PPIP, Spain to approve EUR 64bln of guarantees for bank debt sales & "Today I Think Of Myself As A Government Contractor......" usw.)..... Es sieht ganz so aus als wenn bis auf weiteres The Great "Cover-Up" ohne größere Konsequenzen für die "Beteiligten" auszugehen scheint..... Habe zu diesem Thema unter dem Label "Where Is The Debt To Equity Swap" bereits öfter meinem "Unverständnis" Luft gemacht.....

H/T Option ARMageddon / R. Winkler

We're Speaking Japanese Without Knowing It Hussman

If one seeks analysis about the recent financial crisis, and what most probably lies ahead, it would be wise to place particular weight on the views of economists who saw it coming (and ideally those who provided careful analysis rather than hyperbole

.....At a speech at the Princeton Club last week, economist Carmen Reinhart eiterated that by propping up unhealthy banks, the U.S. is unwittingly committing the same mistakes as the Japanese did in their decade-long stagnation, saying, “These are not zombie loans. They're just non-performing. We're speaking Japanese without knowing it.”

Historically and across countries, according to the IMF, 86% of systemic banking crises have ultimately required government restructuring plans that included closing, nationalizing and merging banks.

Yet the policy response of the U.S. has been akin to putting a band-aid on an untreated infection. Worse, not only has the underlying infection been overlooked, but thanks to the easing of FASB mark-to-market rules early this year, we have at least temporarily stopped reporting on the status of that infection.

After the bubble burst in Japan in 1990, Japanese banks were not compelled to properly disclose their losses either. The predictable result is that the problems resurfaced later, but worse, because they had not been addressed.

This sort of “regulatory forbearance” – setting aside requirements for large loan loss reserves and timely loss disclosure - was helpful during the Latin American debt crisis of the 1980's, but largely because it allowed time for negotiations with countries to restructure debt, first by rescheduling payments, and then ultimately through debt-equity swaps, exit bonds, and other major debt restructuring under the Brady Plan.

Forbearance only works, however, if you're buying time to do something to restructure debt. Instead, we've celebrated bailouts and the easing of reporting requirements as if they are a substitute for restructuring. In my view, this is a mistake that will haunt us.

Our response to the recent crisis has thus far repeated the mistakes made during the Japanese and S&L debacles.

The continued urgency of debt restructuring

With the financial markets cheerily celebrating the end of the recession, credit spreads back to 2007 levels, and analysts referring to the mortgage crisis as largely a thing of the past, it is natural to ask why I would start pounding the tables again about debt restructuring. Old news. Problem solved. Why even bring it up?

The simple answer is that we have not solved the mortgage mess. We have temporarily buried it under a pile of public money, bailing out bank bondholders at public expense. As I've noted before, the best time to panic, in the financial markets, is before everyone else does

Similarly, the best time to consider responses to credit strains is before they surface.

My sincere hope is that if, and I believe when, financial trouble resurfaces, we will be wise enough as a nation to prevent policy makers like Geithner and Bernanke from making the same bailout mistakes twice, protecting irresponsible lenders, and further burdening the nation with debt in the process.

With regard to the banking system, we still have no mechanism by which large undercapitalized banks would be able to absorb large losses with their own balance sheets, in lieu of going into receivership or default. The problem is that there is too much on the balance sheets in the form of debt, and not enough in terms of equity. Citigroup, with about $2 trillion in assets, continues to fund about $600 billion of that through debt to its own bondholders. Customers would never be at risk of loss in the event that Citigroup was to “fail.” The bondholders would.

But we have chosen to defend the bondholders. A cushion on the balance sheet that can't be touched is no cushion at all.

The proper solution is not to bail out the banks, but to create a regulatory structure that allows losses to be absorbed from the capital of bondholders.

UPDATE:

Andy Xie: Why One Bubble Burst Deserves Another Caijing

The lesson from the Lehman collapse seems to be, "Take whatever you can and, when it crashes, you get to keep it." How governments and central banks have dealt with this bubble will encourage more people to join bubble making in the future.

Chris Whalen: The Global Carry Trade And The Crimes Of Patriots via ZH

Since the October 1987 financial crisis, the Federal Reserve System has not denied the Street either liquidity or collateral. The objective goal of policy, it seems, has been to keep the ability of Congress to issue debt intact all the while keeping the casino part of the banking system operating at full steam regardless of the impact on inflation and, more important, investor behavior.....

The EU also has killed any entrepreneurial activity in private banking as well. There is virtually no private capital inflows into the EU banking sector and, in many markets, private and public sector EU banks mostly are insolvent. The EU member states now are the last redoubt for entire nations when it comes to credit.

One wonders how the EU will participate in the stated intention of the G-20 to raise bank capital for riskier activities when many EU banks cannot meet current capital requirements and are facing losses that are equally as large as those unrealized losses facing US banks.

Janet Tavakoli : Wall Street's Fraud Solutions For Systemic Peril ZH

Massive fraud damaged the U.S. economy. (Housing prices didn’t just fall; they plummeted as the fraud unraveled.) U.S. taxpayers became unwilling unsophisticated investors funding Wall Street’s bailout. The Fed uses tax dollars to keep some of our largest banks—weakened by reverse‐Glass‐Steagall mergers with troubled entities—from collapsing under heavy loan losses.

Wall Street’s huge bonus payments were based on suspect accounting. Failure should not result in fortune. Yet, Wall Street once again proposes to pay out exorbitant bonuses.

Many banks’ current illusion of profitability is only made possible by taxpayers’ enormous subsidies including low cost borrowing, higher interest payments on bank capital deposits, a credit line for the FDIC (to be repaid with banks’ subsidized profits), and continued government debt guarantees on bank debt. A large share of certain banks’ tax‐subsidized profits is due as reparation to unsophisticated investors, the U.S. taxpayers.

Troubled financial entities should be put into receivership and restructured. Old shareholders will be wiped out. Debt‐holders will take a haircut (discount) along with a debt for new equity swap to recapitalize the entity.

But the job won’t be complete until we separate high risk activities from traditional banking in a return to a Glass‐Steagall like structure with regulators that indict fraudsters, snuff out systemic fraud, and allow honest bankers to prosper.

Volcker to Banks: Stop Trading with Taxpayer Money WSJ

....the fact that commercial banks that have taken billions in government assistance and whose deposits are now insured by the federal government, continue to take trading risks that Volcker finds unacceptable.

Commercial banks “lend money to businesses, and that’s still a very important function….And that’s why we protect them. I don’t want to see those banks, however, taking a lot of unnecessary risk. It’s risky enough lending money. They don’t have to do a lot of trading on speculative reasons,’’ Volcker says in an interview on “Charlie Rose,”

In other words, Volcker said banks should not be allowed to act like hedge funds trading everything from commodities to debt instruments

The problem is that proprietary trading is a major revenue generator for many commercial banks today. On some levels this could be good for taxpayers because the banks can use their trading profits to help pay back government bail out funds.

Not surprisingly, Volcker admitted during the interview with journalist Charlie Rose, which will be rebroadcast by Bloomberg TV, that he hasn’t found any takers in the Obama administration for his call to separate commercial banking from trading.

In Harsh Reports on S.E.C.’s Fraud Failures, a Watchdog Urges Sweeping Changes

Many on Wall Street and in Washington were surprised that some of Mr. Kotz’s proposals, like recording interviews with witnesses and creating a database for tips and complaints, were not already part of the S.E.C.’s standard practice.

Too Big To Jail :-)

Mark Faber Is Still Making A Lot Of Sense..... Enjoy!

One of my "favourites"...... After listening to the interview or visiting my
earlier post on Faber you know why.... ;-)

Einer meiner absoluten "Favoriten"...... Spätestens nachdem Ihr das Interview bzw meine früheren Posts zu Faber gesehen habt wisst Ihr warum..... ;-)







Update:

Faber: Gloom, Boom or Doom? Credit Writedowns

Brit Bashes Bozos ZH ( No Faber but another person making sense!)

A New Bubble Of the Fed's Creation WaPo

Reflections on "The Last Bear Standing" Mish

Disclosure:

While i agree with several of Faber´s viewpoints i´m "less optimistic" on the markets than Faber ( see here & here ) and will finish with a quote from yesterdays post....

Obwohl ich mit fast allen was Faber zum Besten gibt übereinstimme bin ich im Vergleich doch "weniger optimistisch" im Hinblick auf die Märkte ( siehe here & here ) und kann mir nicht verkneifen ein gestriges Zitat erneut zu wiederholen

Bob, ‘The Bear’, Janjuah via FT Alphaville

I think balance sheets and sustainability - govt, central bank AND private sector, MATTER

If they no longer matter, I will be WRONG, and I will have to accept that the policy of ‘Print/Borrow/Spend on Rubbish we don’t Need’ is a limitless phenomena, without consequences, which means there should never be a bear market ever again….

I hope this sounds as ridiculous to you reading as it did to me when writing…..

Looks Like S&P Equity Anlaysts Are As Competent As Their Debt Analysts.....

This kind of expertise from Wall Street Finest based only on hope of a better bailout deal ( proposed from a major sharholder.... ) sums the market action up..... At least S&P isn´t able to play the Pump & Dump like Goldman & others.... Keep in mind that AIG is one of the Zombie Stocks making up to 20 percent of daily NYSE volume.....

Diese "Expertenmeinung" die einzig und allein auf einem noch besseren Bailoutdeal ( passenderweise vorgeschlagen von einem der Hauptaktionäre ) basiert spiegelt recht schön wider was momentan an den Märkten abgeht.....Immerhin kann man S&P nicht wie z.B. Goldman vorwerfen das altbekannte Pump & Dump zu praktizieren.... Man sollte sich zusärtlich noch ins Gedächnis rufen das AIG eine der Zombie Aktien ist die momentan für knapp 20% des täglichen Handelsvolumens stehen.....


AIG Shares Shoot up on Proposal to Ease Government Loan Terms MarketBeat

AIG jumped roughly 11% today after the powerful House Oversight and Government Reform Committee confirmed receiving a proposal from former CEO Maurice “Hank” Greenberg to restructure the government’s bailout of the insurance giant.

The reports prompted S&P Equity Research to boost AIG to “hold” from “sell.”

“We see this news buoying the shares near term,” S&P’s Catherine Seifert wrote in quick squib earlier today. But before you sink the kid’s college fund into AIG shares, keep this in mind:

It’s far from clear that there’s actually any actual equity value in this company.

“We note June 30 tangible common equity was minus $261.66 per share,” Seifert states

Needless to say that according to Yahoo Finance there is no sell rating ( 10 hold ) on AIG.....;-)

Überflüssig zu erwähnen das lt. Yahoo Finance keine einzige Verkaufsempfehlung ( 10 mal Halten ) existiert.....;-)

UPDATE: Traders Seek Fortune in AIG, a Stock Once Left for Dead WSJ

Where Is The Volume......?

Some very interesting charts & observations from William Hester. As i´ve written earlier i´m very sceptical ( quite an understatement ) regarding the health of the recent market rally..... I´ve added the latest from Rosenberg via Zero Hedge & another Chart via WSJ

Einige sehr aufschlußreiche Charts & Bemerkungen von William Hester. Wie bereits früher geschrieben bin ich extrem skeptisch ( leichte Untertreibung ) was die Verfassung der Märkte angeht. Ich habe zusätzlich noch was vom Rosenberg ( via Zero Hedge ) sowie dem WSJ hinzugefügt.

A Bear Market Lurks as Dow Nears 10000 WSJ

Rosie On Who The Market Buyers Are From this morning's Breakfast With Dave:

Is it the private client? Not really — stock funds actually had net outflows of $1.33 billion last week, while bond funds enjoyed an $8.2 billion net inflow.

Is it corporate insiders? Well, heck no — Robert Toll (CEO of Toll Brothers) just disclosed that he sold a total 1.6 million shares of his company’s stock yesterday.

UPDATE via Hulbert: They are selling a whole lot more of their companies' stock than they are buying. The net difference is even larger than it was two months ago, when I noted that insiders were already selling at a greater pace than at any time since the top of the bull market in the fall of 2007

For the week ended last Friday, according to Vickers, insiders sold 6.31 shares for every one than they bought. The comparable ratio two months ago was 4.16-to-1, and at the March lows the ratio was 0.34-to-1.

Is it buybacks? Not at all — in fact, S&P 500 companies bought back a mere $24.4 billion on stock repurchases in 2Q, down 72% from a year ago and the lowest in recorded history, according to Howard Silverblatt of Standard & Poor’s. ( great Chart via Floyd Norris )

So who’s doing the buying? Very likely it is still a combination of program trading, short coverings and portfolio managers desperately trying to make up for last year’s epic losses.

Without Phoenix Stocks, Volume Continues to Contract Wiliam Hester / Hussman

The most notable characteristic of a durable stock-market advance, which failed to appear in the recent advance, is a strong expansion of trading volume. When you adjust the trading volume data for a handful of mostly lower-quality financial stocks, the picture gets worse.

I noted in Trading Volume Separates Bull Markets from Bear Rallies that bull markets have typically begun on strong volume after selling had become exhausted. As Richard Russell has said - “volume should always be studied as a trend relative to what has preceded it”. The chart below updates one of the graphs for the elapsed time from that earlier piece. The vertical axis measures the six-month percent change in the S&P 500 from the bottom of each bear market going back to the early 1940's. The horizontal axis shows the percent change in volume over that same period.


Familiar durable bear-market bottoms stand out, like in 1982 and 1974. These rallies had strong returns that coincided with large bursts of trading volume during the first six months of the rally. There are a couple of examples, like 1998 and 2003, where bull markets had a good start on mediocre expansions in volume. But for the most part, in the cases where volume contracted the bull market beginnings have been uninspiring. More common is a strong increase in volume that coincides with gains of 20 to 25 percent during the first six months.

It's clear that this year's rally is an extreme outlier in the dataset, with above-average returns and a continued contraction in volume from the levels of trading in March.

Even so, some analysts have become optimistic because volume trends first leveled off, and then have risen marginally over the last few weeks.

But almost the entire rise in volume during the last month and half has come from a handful of stocks. Examples include Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, Citigroup, AIG, and Bank of America

These are just five. There are a couple of other stocks that are interchangeable with these companies and would produce similar results – but the characteristic they all share is that they are financial stocks that only recently were on the brink of collapse. And since the Government's rescue of these and other financial firms, the group has risen up from the ashes. For ease of reference, we'll call these Phoenix stocks.



The rise in trading volumes in some of these stocks has been considerable. The shares of AIG now often trade with 15 times the volume they traded a year ago. Citigroup has traded at 12 times the amount from a year ago. This helps explain why the trades in these companies' shares are taking up a larger fraction of total share volume. The graph below shows the trading volume in the Phoenix stocks as a percent of total NYSE share volume since 2003. You can see that the trend of rising volumes in relation to total volume began during 2008, when volumes rose as the market capitalizations of these companies shares fell. Off of this year's March low, Phoenix volumes as a percent of total volume rose above 5 percent for the first time and then fell off slightly in June and July.

During the last six weeks, the trading in these stocks as a percent of total volume has jumped to almost of fifth of share trading.

Commentators and analysts have offered up a few explanations for the heavy trading in these shares – short covering, the focus of day traders, and institutional trend following programs. Each of those explanations is probably doing their part. Outside of highlighting the casino-like atmosphere that has gripped parts of the stock market, the amount of trading in these shares is less important than the role this trading is playing in the overall volume figures.

The graph below shows two measures of trading volume. The blue line is the daily share volume traded on the NYSE (smoothed). The red line is total volume less the volume traded in our group of Phoenix stocks. As the graph shows, during the last couple of years, the two lines have hardly parted. That's because the Phoenix trading volume was a small fraction of total volume. The recent divergence between the two highlights that volume outside of a handful of these financial stocks continues to contract.

On a Phoenix-volume adjusted basis, NYSE share trading is at the lowest level in years. Healthy bull markets, even if not during the earliest days of a rally, will typically recruit growing amounts of investor interest and expanding levels of volume as prices rise

Expanding volume continues to be an important characteristic missing from this rally.

Update:

I think balance sheets and sustainability - govt, central bank AND private sector, MATTER Bob, ‘The Bear’, Janjuah via FT Alphaville

If they no longer matter, I will be WRONG, and I will have to accept that the policy of ‘Print/Borrow/Spend on Rubbish we don’t Need’ is a limitless phenomena, without consequences, which means there should never be a bear market ever again….

I hope this sounds as ridiculous to you reading as it did to me when writing…..

This quote was just too good to be burried in the comment section...... ;-)

Dieses Zitat war einfach zu gut um es lediglich in den Comments zu posten.. ;-)

Silent Treatment On Bank Write-Downs

More "transparent" accounting........ At least nice to see that even the WSJ calls this accounting "bizarre".....

Schön zu sehen das die Bilanzierung im Finanzwesen seit der Krise noch "transparenter" geworden ist und...... Immerhin bleibt zu bemerken das selbst das ansonsten extrem bankenfreunldiche WSJ diese Bilanzierungsform als "bizarr" klassifiziert.....

Silent Treatment on Bank Write-Downs WSJ

Whenever asset write-downs don't hurt earnings, it pays to look closely. As banks snap up weaker peers, a little-known and somewhat bizarre accounting treatment suddenly has come to the fore.

The past 18 months has spawned the acquisitions of Wachovia by Wells Fargo, Washington Mutual by J.P. Morgan Chase, Countrywide by Bank of America and National City by PNC Financial Services Group. And while bank megamergers likely are over, there could be plenty of fair-size deals among regional banks.

Deserving special scrutiny is the accounting treatment that allows banks to write down acquired loans after the deal, but keep those hits out of their income statements.

It works like this. Bank A buys Bank B, acquiring a loan portfolio, $1 billion of which it believes won't get paid in full. It therefore takes a $200 million write-down on these impaired loans, meaning they come onto Bank A's balance sheet with a fair value of $800 million at the deal date. If those loans subsequently deteriorate, the bank typically has to book a reserve against them, hurting earnings.

However, there is a situation in which postdeal marks don't hit earnings, but only affect shareholders' equity. That is when such adjustments are based on factors that actually existed at the acquisition date, but the acquirer was ignorant of. In the example, Bank A might say it discovered after the deal that another $500 million of acquired loans were in fact impaired at the time of the deal. Bank A's income statement would avoid the hit it then takes on those loans.

Granted, banks can't know everything at the time of a deal. However, adjustments have been large in recent cases, they can take place for a whole year after the deal, and they have happened after acquirers say they have done extensive due diligence.

Moreover, outsiders have no way of gauging whether the circumstances that led to the "look-back" write-downs actually were there at the time of the deal. Their best hope is that auditors are keeping track.

PNC initially classified $19.29 billion of National City loans as impaired, as of closing at year-end 2008, marking them down to $11.9 billion. But in the first half of this year, PNC classified another $2.6 billion of National City loans as impaired, marking them down by $1.6 billion, or a sizable 62%.

If look-back adjustments weren't allowed, PNC might have had to take a hefty reserve against these loans, possibly eroding the bank's $905 million of first-half pretax earnings.

PNC said it had only 69 days between announcing the deal and closing it to review loans, while real-estate appraisers faced a "significant backlog." And the bank has booked reserves on other impaired National City loans, because of deterioration after the deal.

> Compared to other "creative" accounting stunts this example isn´t sounding really "bizarre"......;-) Will be interesting to see if Wells Fargo will use this tool to manage their earnings and especially if the market is once again willing to accept the often very poor earnings & balance sheet quality of almost all financial companies.... Could be the inflection point to short this market.....

> Verglichen mit all den anderen kreativen Bilanzierungsformen hört sich selbst das o.g. Beispiel wenig "bizarr" an......;-) Ich denke es lohnt sich darauf zu achten ob insbesondere Wells Fargo das o.g. Schlupfloch nutzen wird. Sollte der Markt die oft extrem schwache Gewinn und Bilanzqaulität der Finanzinstitue zur Abwechslung mal nicht abfeiern könnte dies der Wendepunkt für die Märkte sein.

Dilbert......

:-)!

Bigger
Version / Größere Version

"Today I Think Of Myself As A Government Contractor......"

When you here this kind of quote in context with the mortgage business it should be clear that in the not so distant future another not so "insignificant" bailout is already in the cards..... Looks like the Phony Mae & Fraudie Mac pain wasn´t enough.......

Wenn mal soclche Sätze im Zusammenhang mit dem Hypothekengeschäft hört ist der nächste "nicht unwesentliche" Bailout nicht weit.... Sieht ganz so aus als wenn der Phony Mae & Fraudie Mac Schaden doch noch nicht hoch genug war....... Da geht noch was......

No Easy Exit for Government as Housing Market's Savior WSJ

After a year of extraordinary interventions in the economy, the federal government is starting to pare its support for the private sector. It doesn't look that way to Peter Lansing, president of mortgage firm Universal Lending.

The Denver home lender sees every day how dependent the housing market has become on the government. At the height of the boom, just 20% of Universal's mortgages were backed by the Federal Housing Administration, an arm of the government that guarantees loans to borrowers who can't afford big down payments. Today, the FHA accounts for more than 80% of his business. For Mr. Lansing, this represents a new way of life -- more government, more paperwork, but also a lot of sales that wouldn't have happened otherwise.

"Over 29 years in business, we've always thought of ourselves as being in the free-enterprise system. Today I think of myself as a government contractor,"

Over the past year, the government has intervened heavily at essentially every stage of the home-buying process. In fact, more than 80% of the new residential mortgage loans made this year benefited from some form of government support, according to the trade publication Inside Mortgage Finance.

Speaking of CHUZPAH....... Make sure you compare this comment with the last update at the end of the post....Same CEO ......

Einigen Bänkern sind selbstredend auch die 80% noch zu wenig...... Vergleicht den nachfolgenden Kommentar mit dem vom Update am Ende des Posting.... Handelt sich um den selben CEO....

Wells Fargo urges US to boost mortgage market

The US government should help revive the moribund market for big mortgages by getting Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to buy large home loans from banks, the chief executive of the lender Wells Fargo urged in an interview with the FT on Tuesday. John Stumpf, whose bank originates a quarter of all US mortgages, called for an increase in the size of loans purchased by Fannie and Freddie, the troubled finance groups controlled by the authorities.

Buffet will be proud ......

Buffet wird es freuen.....

Behind FHA Strains, a Push to Lift Housing WSJ

The FHA insures loans secured with down payments as low as 3.5%. But values in many markets in which it has been increasing its activity have fallen far more than that in the past year. The result: A growing number of homeowners with FHA-backed loans owe more than their homes are worth and are more likely to default.

At the end of June, some 7.8% of FHA-backed loans were 90 days late or more, or in foreclosure, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association, up from 5.4% a year ago.

In July, California accounted for 13% of the FHA's mortgages, up from 1.5% in 2006.

Mounting losses have eaten into the FHA's cash cushion. Federal law says the FHA must maintain, after expected losses, reserves equal to at least 2% of the loans insured by the agency. The ratio last year was around 3%, down from 6.4% in 2007.

UPDATE: WaPo: FHA Cash Reserves Will Drop Below Requirement

The Next Fannie Mae : Ginnie Mae and FHA are becoming $1 trillion subprime guarantors WSJ

Only last week, Ginnie announced that it issued a monthly record of $43 billion in mortgage-backed securities in June. Ginnie Mae President Joseph Murin sounded almost giddy as he cheered this “phenomenal growth.” Ginnie Mae’s mortgage exposure is expected to top $1 trillion by the end of next year—or far more than double the dollar amount of 2007. (See the nearby table.) Earlier this summer, Reuters quoted Anthony Medici of the Housing Department’s Inspector General’s office as saying, “Who would have predicted that Ginnie Mae and Fannie Mae would have swapped positions” in loan volume?

Ginnie’s mission is to bundle, guarantee and then sell mortgages insured by the Federal Housing Administration, which is Uncle Sam’s home mortgage shop. Ginnie’s growth is a by-product of the FHA’s spectacular growth. The FHA now insures $560 billion of mortgages—quadruple the amount in 2006. Among the FHA, Ginnie, Fannie and Freddie, nearly nine of every 10 new mortgages in America now carry a federal taxpayer guarantee.

Banks Load Up on Mortgages, in New Way WSJ

Banks have been silent partners in the meteoric rise of the Federal Housing Administration.

In the past year, the nation's financial institutions have snapped up securities backed by Ginnie Mae, a government-owned agency that guarantees payments on mortgages backed by the FHA. That helped drive demand for Ginnie securities and created an outlet for billions of dollars of FHA-backed loans made to borrowers who in many cases couldn't afford big down payments.

As of June 30, the roughly 8,500 federally insured banks and thrifts were holding $113.5 billion of Ginnie securities, compared with just $41 billion a year earlier, according to a Wall Street Journal analysis of bank financial disclosures. It is the largest amount that banks have reported holding since at least 1994.

Banks, sometimes with the blessing of federal regulators, have been loading up on Ginnie securities for one main reason: They make their balance sheets look healthier. Since the securities are guaranteed by the government, federal banking regulators have deemed them risk-free, meaning that adding them to a bank's investment portfolio, or replacing assets deemed riskier, lowers the overall risk of the portfolio in the eyes of regulators.

Some banks have used government cash infusions under the Troubled Asset Relief Program to buy Ginnie Mae bonds.

Holding Ginnie bonds help banks look better because federal bank-capital guidelines give the Ginnie securities a "risk weighting" of 0%. That means banks don't have to hold any cash in reserve to protect against losses. By contrast, securities backed by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the two mortgage giants seized by the government, carry a 20% risk weighting, meaning some cash needs to be set aside to hold them, even though most banks and investors think there is scant risk of Fannie or Freddie securities defaulting. Privately issued mortgage-backed securities can receive risk weightings of 50%, while many other types of debt carry 100%.

Because of the different risk weightings, bankers say they are selling relatively safe assets like Fannie securities and replacing them with Ginnie securities. The move doesn't shrink banks' balance sheets or remove their troubled assets. But it reduces their total assets on a risk-weighted basis. That is important because risk-weighted assets are the denominator in some key ratios of bank capital.

Like some peers, First State bankrolled those purchases partly with taxpayer dollars that were intended to stabilize the banking industry and jump-start lending. The 32-branch bank used a "significant portion" of the $20 million it received through TARP to buy Ginnie securities, Mr. Clark said.

Mr. Clark credits the strategy with helping First State preserve its capital ratios even as loan defaults swelled to $9.5 million on June 30 from $1.6 million a year earlier. During the same period, its total risk-based capital ratio climbed to 11.3% from 10.7%. That gave First State some breathing room above the 10% ratio regulators require for banks to be deemed "well capitalized."

Ms. Keeling acknowledged that the strategy doesn't ease the bank's underlying problems. "The whole capital ratio can be manipulated ... in many ways to make it appear better or worse," she said.

In St. Augustine, Fla., Prosperity Bank increased its holdings of Ginnie securities tenfold over the past year. The lender, with 20 branches and $1.2 billion in assets, simultaneously dumped most of its Fannie and Freddie securities, even though they seemed safe.

"There's no more risk in Fannie and Freddie securities than in a Ginnie security," despite the different capital treatments, said CEO Eddie Creamer.

Ginnie and the FHA, units of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, have become two of the most powerful mortgage financiers in the U.S. When banks make home loans, the FHA insures them against default. Then the mortgages are pooled together and packaged into mortgage-backed securities. Ginnie guarantees that buyers of those securities -- including banks and other investors -- will continue to receive interest and principal payments on the debt, even if borrowers start to default.

Rolfe Winkler nails it!

Rolfe Winkler formuliert es perfekt!

"It’s equally likely the agency will continue to be a conduit through which the Obama administration funnels cash to the housing market"

Over $600 billion of loans backed by the end of this year — many very risky due to very low downpayments — but no chief risk officer….

A canary in the coal mine was the raid on Taylor Bean & Whitaker, a multi-billion dollar lender that had seen its FHA lending business expand very quickly over the past year. But TBW’s underwriting was terrible so FHA suspended them from issuing its loans. By the end, TBW’s business had grown to $100m-$150m worth of loans per day. The suspension put TBW out of business overnight.

Karl Denninger is also "passionate" when it comes to the FHA topic..... ;-)

Wer die etwas "deftigere" Sprache bevorzugt dem empfehle ich die FHA Sichtweise von Karl Denninger.... ;-)

Uncle Sam Bets the House on Mortgages WSJ

Right now, housing remains on government life support. Treasury-backed entities are guaranteeing about 85% of new mortgages, while the Fed buys 80% of the securities into which these taxpayer-backed mortgages are packaged

Rather than trying to implement change, the government appears to be reinforcing a system in which it provides subsidies to an asset that periodically goes through highly leveraged speculative booms.

Despite the bust, conforming mortgages that qualify for government backing remain mispriced. That can be seen in the fact that banks have no desire to keep the most common mortgage on their books.

Wells's chief executive, John Stumpf, recently said: "We're not putting on 30-year [fixed-rate] mortgages at these rates."

So why should the taxpayer take them?

Stuffing Sam Sudden Debt

In financial market parlance "getting stuffed" is being left with a losing position in a trade because the counterparty to the transaction claims to not recognize it (also known as DK, or Don't Know). It's equivalent to someone dropping their trash on your doorstep and walking away, claiming it's not theirs.....

The following chart gives the breakdown in the 1Q2009; a massive 41% of all mortgages outstanding are now directly owned or guaranteed by Uncle Sam, since Fannie and Freddie have been placed into federal conservatorship.

Trade Tensions Are Brewing........

Juts what the doctor ordered...... As i´ve feared last week the "conditions" for world trade are not getting better...... Lets all hope that the tensions don´t escalate....... Just in China to request WTO consultations with US over tyre dispute - Commerce Ministry China says: - US tyre decision violates WTO rules. - Wants dialogue with US on tyre tariffs.Source: RTRS

Würde noch zum perfektem Sturm fehlen...... Wie bereits letzte Woche befürchtet verbessen die die "Rahmenbedingungen" für den immer noch in der Reha befindlichen Welthandel nicht wirklich. Die Spannungen zwischen einzelnen Ländern und der Ruf nach Protektionismus wird doch deutlich vernehmbarer. Bleibt nur zu hoffen das diese nicht wirklich eskalieren....... Update: China to request WTO consultations with US over tyre dispute - Commerce Ministry China says: - US tyre decision violates WTO rules. - Wants dialogue with US on tyre tariffs.Source: RTRS )

A Tale of Two Depressions VOX

The downward spiral in global trade volumes has abated, and the most recent month for which we have data (June) shows a modest uptick. Nonetheless, the collapse of global trade, even now, remains dramatic by the standards of the Great Depression.

Volume of world trade, now vs then

China Probes ‘Unfair Trade’ in U.S. Chicken and Auto Products

Sept. 14 (Bloomberg) -- China announced dumping and subsidy probes of chicken and auto products from the U.S., two days after President Barack Obama imposed tariffs on tires from the Asian nation.

Chinese industries complain that they’re being hurt by “unfair trade practices,” the nation’s Ministry of Commerce said on its Web site yesterday. The dumping investigation relates to poultry alone, a spokesman said in Beijing today. The ministry didn’t specify the value of imports of the products.

Rising protectionism may hamper world trade and undermine the global economy’s recovery from recession, the European Central Bank ( see end of the post for details )said last week.

The U.S. placed tariffs starting at 35 percent on $1.8 billion of tire imports from China, backing a United Steelworkers union complaint against the second-largest U.S. trading partner.

China Reacts Quickly and Badly to Tire Tariffs Naked Capitalism

It would be better if we were not proven correct on this one, but when the US imposed stiff tariffs on imported tires from China late on Friday, we noted, “This could get interesting in a bad way.” The Chinese responded quickly over the weekend to announce they were investigating US auto parts and chicken, which together account for roughly as much as the disputed tires ($1.2 billion versus $1.3 billion for tires).

But protectionism is driven by the desire to protect jobs. Unemployment has not peaked in the US, and some analysts suggest that China’s job losses are far worse than the 20 million often bandied about, more on the order of 30 to 50 million. So political pressure is set to intensify.

The New York Times treats the Chinese reaction as a surprise. But the tire tariffs relied upon a special provision in the WTO agreement for China’s entry that set a lower bar for trade violations than the normal anti-dumping sort. This is the first time that rule has been used as the basis for an action against China, and China may feel it important to fight that precedent.

Obama Risks Global Trade War With Misguided Tariffs Mish

Not a single job will return to the US as a result of these tariffs. Imports from China will drop but imports from elsewhere will rise.Thus, the unfortunate tragedy in this mess is that Obama's kowtowing to the unions is going to cost union jobs. The ultimate irony is misguided unions are cheering every step of the way.To date, Obama is repeating the same mistakes Roosevelt and Hoover made during the Great Depression

Now, Obama's tire and steel tariffs will strongly encourage more unions and labor groups to seek relief under "Section 421" of U.S. trade law. That misguided law does not require petitioners to prove unfair trade practices.

If Obama keeps this foolishness up, which right now seems highly likely, he risks a global trade war similar to the global trade crash kicked off by the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act signed by President Hoover in the early stages of Great Depression.

China Strikes Back on Trade WSJ

Citing a jump in Chinese imports, the Obama administration said Friday it would impose stiff tariffs on Chinese-made tires for the next three years, invoking a section of trade law that China agreed to as a condition for its joining the World Trade Organization in 2001. The move essentially would cut off the source of nearly 17% of all tires sold in the U.S. last year and hit cost-conscious consumers particularly hard, as retailers will have to find alternative sources for the lower-end tires that make up much of what China sends to the U.S.

Beijing responded quickly. Sunday, its Ministry of Commerce said it was starting antidumping procedures against U.S. exporters into China of chicken and auto products. It said it had received complaints from local producers that the U.S. products were being dumped in China at below-market prices. The ministry denied that the move, which could lead to sanctions, was protectionist.

Both chicken and auto products have been part of a battle between China and the U.S. in which both sides have already instituted trade-restricting measures. China has already effectively blocked U.S. exports of poultry products in retaliation for a similar U.S. block of Chinese poultry. And earlier this year, China raised tariffs on imported auto parts.

Foreign businesses operating in China have also argued that China is itself engaging in protectionism. The European Union Chamber of Commerce in China recently released a catalog of business complaints chronicling a deteriorating atmosphere for foreign enterprises operating in China. The country's recent stimulus package, for example, in some cases favored domestic manufacturers, the EU Chamber said.

Chinese President Hu Jintao is set to meet Mr. Obama this month at an economic summit in Pittsburgh. Mr. Obama is to visit China in mid-November.

Chinese officials "are definitely going to do something to express their dissatisfaction, but it won't be serious," Mr. Yan said. "The two sides need each other."

Michael Pettis / China Financial Markets

A few months ago I wrote about an HKMA paper that suggested that the implicit interest-rate subsidy to SOEs ( State Owned Enterprises)– not relative to the “right” interest rate in China (whatever that may be but which is certainly many percentage points higher than the official lending rates) but relative to the borrowing cost of large Chinese private corporations – accounted for 100% of SOE profitability. If China had reasonable interest rates, in other words, (and in fact there were negative real rates for much of the recent past), SOEs would on average be value destroyers.

Most of the press focus is on US-China disputes, and the truth is that these matter a lot because this is the most important trade relationship, but trade-surplus countries are in disputes almost everywhere. This, in my opinion, is only likely to continue. I suspect that we will make a concerted effort to coordinate the adjustment process only after things have gotten much worse for everybody.

>Here is the comment from the ECB.....

>Hier der oben angesprochene Kommentar der EZB......

Protektionismus : EZB sieht "Spirale der Vergeltung" FTD

The ECB is pointing to a study that after the G-20 Summit in November 2008 17 of the 20 states have been implementing protectionist measures.... This is in stark contrast to what they have promised ( my translation )

Sie verweist auf eine Studie, nach der nach dem G-20-Gipfel im November 2008 17 der 20 Staaten protektionistische Maßnahmen angekündigt hatten - obwohl sich die Staats- und Regierungschefs dort klar gegen jeden Protektionismus ausgesprochen hatten

More Bad News For Dubai ......

Time for another update from Dubai...... Compared to The Upcoming Skyscraper Tsunami the rotten performance of their SWF is only a minor problem...... But it seems that almost everything Dubai pushed forward during the past few years is running into trouble...... Clearly a poster child for the bubble years......

Es ist mal wieder Zeit für ein Update aus dem vermeintlichen Wunderland Dubai....... Sieht so als fast alles was die dort anfassen wirklich nur auf Sand gebaut ist...... Verglichen mit dem Upcoming Skyscraper Tsunami ist die lausige Performance des SWF wohl aber nur ein winziges Problem...... Dubai ist sicher das Paradebeispiel für die Bubble Jahre. Was hier an Gigantismuß in den Wüstensand bzw. auf künstlichen Inseln versenkt worden sprengt wirklich jeden Rahmen......
Istithmar Said to Halt Investment; Dubai Weighs Sale (Bloomberg)

Istithmar World, the Dubai sovereign wealth fund, is halting investments as part of a restructuring effort after spending more than $25 billion this decade on stakes ranging from a yacht marina to luxury retailer Barneys New York, according to people familiar with the plan.

> I just couldn´t resist.... via Istithmar World

> Konnte hier einfach nicht widerstehen.... via Istithmar World

Retail Deal of the Year for 2007 for acquisition of Barneys New York (2007) Investment Dealers Digest

Istithmar World Capital Announces Additional Capital Support For Barneys New York 2009

"Istithmar World Capital has provided a significant level of additional capital to support Barneys New York. Working closely with management, we believe that this amount allows the company financial flexibility to work with the company's major vendors and financial intermediaries.

> With deals like this no wonder Istithmar has won several awards..... ;-)

> Dank solch gelungener Deals ist es kein Wunder das Istithmar mit Preisen überhäuft worden ist.... ;-)

Best Private Equity House (2008) Banker Middle East

Best Private Equity House Award (2007) Banker Middle East

> Surprising to see that the WHITE ELEFANT MGM City Center in Vegas didn´t win a special award..... Update: Video City Center

> Fast überraschend zu sehen das die wohl größte Fehlleistung das MGM City Center in Vegas nicht auch noch einen Sonderpreis abgeräumt hat..... Update: Video City Center

> Back to Bloomberg....

The process may result in a sale of the fund or its assets, they said. Istithmar, run by David Jackson, said this week that co-chief investment officers John Amato and Felix Herlihy would leave the firm. Jackson’s job is under review, the people said.

A restructuring by Istithmar and its parent Dubai World may mark the most public reversal of fortune for a state-controlled investment firm since global credit markets seized up in 2007.

Sovereign wealth funds, fueled in part by oil revenue, have become sources of capital around the world for companies, including Citigroup Inc. and Morgan Stanley.

Istithmar and Dubai World have struggled this year on investments, including Barneys, which may be facing a restructuring or bankruptcy, according to people familiar with the retailer, and CityCenter, an $11 billion project in Las Vegas.

Abu Dhabi, the wealthiest member of the United Arab Emirates, provided a $10 billion bailout this year for Dubai as the emirate struggled to meet payments on $80 billion of debt used to finance real-estate projects. ....

> Won´t be the last time Abu Dhabi will be bailing out Dubai........ What a mess....

> Abu Dhabi darf sich jetzt schon einmal freuen das hier demnächst in regelmäßigen Abständen Bailouts fällig werden.... Sieht immer mehr so aus als wenn hinter den glitzernden Fassaden nur heisse Luft steckt.... Ein gewisses Maß an Schadenfreude kann ich mir da nicht verkneifen.....

UPDATE: Dubai’s Trail of Dud Deals Shows Sovereign Wealth Gone Awry

Dubai investment firm Istithmar World may be the first sovereign wealth fund to liquidate after a $27 billion spending spree financed largely with borrowed money, people briefed on the matter said.

Unlike government-controlled funds in Kuwait and Abu Dhabi, flush with cash from oil production, or in China, backed by export earnings, Istithmar fueled purchases such as the takeover of Barneys New York by borrowing as much as 90 percent of the money, the people said.

Istithmar’s parent, Dubai World, tapped Middle Eastern and European banks including Barclays Plc, Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc and Deutsche Bank AG, leaving those three with combined debt holdings of at least $1.5 billion, the people said.

“Dubai sovereign wealth funds are leveraged like private equity funds"

Istithmar contributed about $2.5 billion of its own cash to back $27 billion of purchases since 2003, the people said, speaking anonymously because the strategy was private. It used so-called non-recourse bank loans, backed by specific assets, to finance about 75 percent of its acquisitions, one of the people said.

Dubai World is in talks with its creditor banks to restructure at least $12 billion in debt, a person close to the talks said, speaking anonymously because the negotiations are private.

Istithmar or its assets will probably be sold to help its parent repay the debt, the person said. Nakheel PJSC, the Dubai World unit behind a series of palm-shaped, man-made islands on the emirate’s coast, has a $3.52 billion Islamic bond due in December

One example of risky investing, according to Turner, came in 2007, when Dubai World bought about $5.5 billion of MGM Mirage stock at between $82 and $95 without any hedge. The stock now trades at about $12.

Refinancing Dubai’s debt became more difficult with the onset of the global credit crisis as lending froze. It has about $80 billion of outstanding corporate and government debt, according a report by Moody’s in February. That almost matches the emirate’s $82 billion gross domestic product in 2008, the report said.

A Dubai Investment Arm Struggles With Debt Load NYT

Set up in 2003, Istithmar came to be seen as the public face of a brash, acquisitive Dubai, which, unlike more conservative sovereign funds operating in the region, deployed high levels of leverage to finance a shopping spree that included the Queen Elizabeth 2 luxury liner; the department store Barneys New York; a stake in Cirque du Soleil, from Montreal; as well as luxury hotels in New York like the W on Union Square and the Mandarin Oriental on Columbus Circle.

Most of these investments — including that in Perella Weinberg Partners, the investment boutique, and GLG Partners, the asset management company — were done at the top of the market, from 2005 to 2007.

Istithmar was in many respects a scaled-down version of Dubai — using bravado, debt and some dollops of cash to invest in global markets

Competitive Devaluation "Israel Edition"

With exports making up about 45% of the country's economy it is no wonder the Bank of Israel is intervening massively.....More countries will follow the Swiss, Israel & China......Will be interesting to see when Japan will voice "their concern" about the recent Yen strength.....This are not good news for global trade......I expect the € to be the main target of the intervetions.... More significant "headwinds" for European exporters.......

Da Exporte knapp 45% der Wirtschaftsleistung ausmachen ist es wenig verwunderlich das die Bank of Israel diesen für alle Tradingpartner ungünstigen Weg gewählt hat gegen den Shekel zu intervenieren......Denke das auf Sicht sich immer mehr Länder der Schweiz, Israel und China ( die USA kommen ja schon seit geraumer Zeit ohne Interventionen aus... ;-) anschließen werden.... Bin gespannt wann Japan in den Ring steigt und sein "Unbehagen" über die jüngste Yen Stärke zum Ausdruck bringt......Unschwer zu erkennsen das dies auf Dauer für den globalen Handel wenig förderlich ist..... Da der Großteil der Anpassungen zu Lasten des € geht sind das alles in allem keine guten Nachrichten für die europäischen Exporteure......


Israel's Fischer Wins Kudos for Central Bank Role Amid Crisis WSJ

From May 2008 through the end of last month, Mr. Fischer spent $28.4 billion, or about 14% of Israel's gross domestic product, buying foreign currency. While the central bank never said it was acting to weaken the Israeli shekel, the purchases did just that, helping to keep Israeli exports competitively priced.

> If you consider that since the intervetion the Shekel has devalued even against the Greenback you know how "succsessful" they have been.....You can watch the effects on the exchange rate here ( switch to the 1 year chart )

> Man muß eigentlich nur erwähnen das der Shekel seit der Intervention sogar gegenüber dem USD abgewertet hat..... Einen besseren "Erfolgsnachweis" kann es nicht geben......Den Effekt der Anwertung kann hier ( bitte die Jahrescharts Einstellung wählen ) "bewundert" werden

Update:

US Fires Opening Salvo In Trade Wars With China Mish

Trade Tensions With China Quietly Escalating Naked Capitalism

Protektionismus : EZB sieht "Spirale der Vergeltung" FTD

Sie verweist auf eine Studie, nach der nach dem G-20-Gipfel im November 2008 17 der 20 Staaten protektionistische Maßnahmen angekündigt hatten - obwohl sich die Staats- und Regierungschefs dort klar gegen jeden Protektionismus ausgesprochen hatten

The ECB is pointing to a study that after the G-20 Summit in November 2008 17 of the 20 states have been implementing protectionist measures.... This is in stark contrast to what they have promised ( my translation )

A Tale of Two Depressions VOX

The downward spiral in global trade volumes has abated, and the most recent month for which we have data (June) shows a modest uptick. Nonetheless, the collapse of global trade, even now, remains dramatic by the standards of the Great Depression.

Volume of world trade, now vs then

Update Blogroll

Time for a another update and as a "Goldbug" ( even while i´m in the deflation camp for some time to come , i think the latest "interest" in Gold has something to do that more and more are realizing that we havn´t seen the latest chapter in this timeline..... H/T The Mess That Greenspan Made ) i couldn´t resist to post this timeless image from Wall Street Follies .....

Es ist mal wieder höchste Zeit meine Blogroll auf Vordermann zu bringen..... Als "Goldbug" ( obwohl ich die bis auf weiteres der Deflationsfraktion zuzuorden bin... Denke das erneute Interesse in Gold hat vielmehr damit zu tun das immer mehr begreifen das wir noch lange nicht das letzte Kapitel in dieser Zeitachse geschrieben haben.....) kann ich mir aus gegebenen Anlaß natürlich nicht verkneifen die zeitlose "Empfehlung" von Wall Street Follies zu posten.....

Chris Martenson

Contrary Investor

Expected Returns

Felix Salmon

Global Economy Matters / Edward Hugh

Markt-Daten-Blog / German

News From 1930

The Market Ticker / Karl Denninger

Ultimi Barbarorum