Showing posts with label abcp. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abcp. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 18, 2007

SIV liquidity problems: The next wave looms

Another reason to strenghten the balance sheets or we soon will see more news like this or this Santa Claude at the ECB. It looks like Santa Claude will have to return more than once a year.....

Ein weiterer Grund um die Bilanzen so schnell wie möglich zu stärken oder wir werden un s bald an Meldungen wie diese und diese Santa Claude at the ECB gewöhnen müssen. Santa Claude wird wohl demnächst öfter als einmal jährlich erscheinen müsen.....

FT Alphaville Funding problems for the structured investment vehicles at the heart of this year’s liquidity troubles are far from over, despite the move by a number of banks to step in to support their vehicles, reports the FT’s Paul Davies on Tuesday.

January will bring the start of a second wave of liquidity problems for SIVs as the vast majority of medium-term funding starts to come due for repayment, according to a report from Dresdner Kleinwort analysts to be published on Wednesday.

SIVs rely on cheap, short-term debt to fund investments in longer-term, higher-yielding securities. This cheap debt has come from both the very short-term commercial paper markets and from the slightly longer maturity, medium-term note (MTN) markets. CP funding has long dried up and much of what was sold has matured.

So far, SIVs have primarily felt the impact of collapsed CP issuance, Domenico Picone at DrK told the FT. Outstanding MTN for the 30 SIVs currently stands at $181bn, which will be the next liquidity challenge they face, he added.

This represents almost 65 per cent of the value of the SIV sector in mid-October, and it is likely that SIVs have shrunk a great deal more since then.

According to the DrK analysts’ calculations, two-thirds of all MTN funding for SIVs comes due for repayment by the end of next September. Almost $40bn is to be repaid from January to March alone.

> Yves from Naked Capitalism nails it

No wonder banks are hoarding cash.....

AddThis Feed Button

Monday, December 17, 2007

"Honey, I Shrunk The Company" Centro Properties Down 76 Per Cent

Another one in the series Honey, I Shrunk The Company"....

Ein weiterer Kandidat aus der Serie Honey, I Shrunk The Company".....

Flashback March 2007
Centro Properties of Australia is set to become the fifth-largest operator of shopping centres in the US after agreeing to buy New Plan Excel Realty Trust for $3.7bn in cash. The deal is the biggest acquisition to date by an Australian real estate investment trust in the US. Including debt, it amounts to $6.2bn. Centro said it would finance the takeover by issuing new shares worth A$1.25bn in both the company and the trust, as well as raising a further A$750m from fund inflows and hybrid financing. JPMorgan Chase will underwrite the share offering.
Shopping for subprime victims, down under FT Alphaville
Anyone still needing to be convinced that synthetic financial strife has real world consequences could look down under on Monday - to Centro Properties, the Australian shopping mall operator. A cut in its 2008 earnings forecast of 13.6 per cent caused a 76 per cent plunge in its share price - bringing Centro’s market cap down from A$4.82bn to A$1.15bn.

Bloomberg

Centro Properties Group, the owner of 700 U.S. shopping malls, slumped 76 percent in Sydney trading and said it's struggling to refinance debt because of the collapse in the U.S. subprime housing market.

With A$26.6bn of property on its books, the company is having to face up to sharply higher financing costs and is already looking at selling its US acquisitions to private equity buyers, although no names were mentioned. As recently as March it paid US$6.2bn to acquire New Plan Excel Realty Trust.

Taken from todays Centro Presentation



Centro said it had won an extension for all of its maturing debt - but only up until February 15. Refinancing talk continuing in the meantime. Chairman Brian Healey said:

Tightened credit conditions have…had the effect that negotiation of a comprehensive refinancing package of these short-term facilities has not yet occurred.“It has become clear that to secure longer term financing in the current illiquid credit market, Centro will need to reduce its gearing level significantly.

Last week, Merrill Lynch said that it had doubts about Centro’s business model and rating agency Standard & Poor’s put the group on credit watch, causing a temporary suspension of Centro’s shares.

> I assume they will have to update their statement on securitisation ( and others) from their euphoric annual 2007 review

> Sieht ganz so aus als wenn die Aussagen zum Verbriefungsmodell in dem rückblickend mehr als amüsanten Rückblick für das Jahr 2007 nicht mehr ganz aktuell sind

The 2007 financial year has seen retail property continue to deliver strong total returns to investors.”
Brian Healey, Chairman

The benefits of using a CMBS funding arrangement compared to traditional
bank debt are:

• It is more flexible;
• It involves less administration; and
• It has more generous loan covenants.

OUCH!
AddThis Feed Button

Tuesday, October 30, 2007

Federal Home Loan Banks Act As A Lender Of Last Resort......

You already know what is coming when you read this statement from FHLB ......

Jeder der diese Zielsetzung der FHLB liest weiß was kommen muß........

The mission of the Federal Home Loan Banks is to improve access to housing for all Americans by providing FHLBank members with lowcost mortgage funding and by supporting community development.
Everytime you think the fallout from the housing debt will hit the banks another "vehicle/institution" shows up that acts as a lender of last resort. Maybe the Bank of England should use this as a blueprint to solve their "problems". Stories like this remind me why i´m bullish on gold.......

Immer wenn man glaubt alles gesehen zu haben kommt der nächste Hammer und man fragt sich ob das wirklich stimmen kann. Schon praktisch wenn man sich bei Problemen praktisch unbegrenzt zu AAA Konditionen unabhängig vom Risiko mit Liquidität eindecken kann. Evtl. sollte die Bank of England dieses Modell zur Lösung Ihrer Probleme übernehmen. Solche Nachrichten bestätigen mich Tag für Tag in meinem bullishen Ausblick für Gold......

U.S. Tosses Lifeline to Lenders Using Home Loan Banks
Oct. 30 (Bloomberg) -- Banks shut out of the market for short-term loans are finding salvation in a government lending program set up to revive housing during the Great Depression.

Countrywide Financial Corp., Washington Mutual Inc., Hudson City Bancorp Inc. and hundreds of other lenders borrowed a record $163 billion from the 12 Federal Home Loan Banks in August and September as interest rates on asset-backed commercial paper rose as high as 5.6 percent. The government-sponsored companies were able to make loans at about 4.9 percent, saving the private banks about $1 billion in annual interest.

To meet the sudden demand, the institutions sold $143 billion of short-term debt in August and September, according to the FHLBs' Office of Finance. The sales pushed outstanding debt up 21 percent to a record $1.15 trillion, an amount that may become a burden to U.S. taxpayers because almost half comes due before 2009.

> The graph for 2007 is only including September. If this pace continues the numbers should be even more shocking.........

> Bedenkt bitte das diese Grafik nur die Zahlen bis einschließlich September beinhaltet. Leicht auszurechnen wie das am Ende des Jahres aussieht.......

The government is ``taking a lot of risks through the Federal Home Loan Banks that are unnecessary,'' according to Peter Wallison, a fellow at the American Enterprise Institute, a Washington-based organization that analyzes public policy, and general counsel at the Treasury Department from 1981 until 1985.

The home loan banks, known as FHLBs, are increasing risks to taxpayers by assuming the role as a lender of last resort, said Wallison. That's the job of the Federal Reserve, he said.

System Shock
A loss of confidence in the companies could prompt investors to dump FHLB debt, potentially causing the collapse of one or more banks, according to Wallison and lawmakers including Representative Richard Baker of Louisiana. If others were unable to meet the liabilities, taxpayers would be on the hook, they said.

The FHLBs are cooperatives created by President Herbert Hoover in 1932 to spur mortgage lending. The system's 8,100 owners and customers range from New York-based Citigroup Inc., the largest U.S. bank, to the single-branch Custer Federal Savings & Loan in Broken Bow, Nebraska. Their government ties support top AAA ratings from Standard & Poor's and Moody's Investors Service.

Bigger Than Government
They borrow in the bond market and lend the money to their members. Federal Home Loan Bank obligations, when combined with the $1.5 trillion debt and $4.7 trillion in bond guarantees of Washington-based Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in McLean, Virginia, are 46 percent more than the $5.04 trillion of Treasury debt held by the public.

Lenders turned to the FHLB as two main sources of funding, short-term IOUs backed by mortgages and mortgage-bond sales, began to dry up in August. That's when losses on securities tied to subprime home loans began to spread throughout the credit markets and investors retreated to the relative safety of Treasuries and their equivalents.

Asset-backed commercial paper outstanding fell 25 percent to $883.7 billion as of last week from $1.18 trillion on Aug. 8, data compiled by the Fed show.

Sales of mortgage bonds, excluding those issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have tumbled by 66 percent to a monthly average of $39 billion from $115 billion in 2006, according to Friedman Billings Ramsey Group Inc., a securities firm in Arlington, Virginia.

`Only Game'
The home loan banks ``were the only game in town for a lot of borrowers,'' said Jim Vogel, head of agency debt research at FTN Financial a securities firm in Memphis, Tennessee. They are ``like an old watch your grandfather left you years ago, and you pull it out of the drawer and find it's the only timepiece you have.''

In July, lenders could raise funds by issuing one-month asset-backed commercial paper that yielded 1.8 basis points less on average than the one-month London interbank offered rate. A basis point is 0.01 percentage point.

In September, the asset-backed commercial paper, when it was available, cost as much as 51 basis points more than Libor. At the same time, the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York offered one-month funds at an average of 48 basis points below Libor, making their loans more attractive.

The FHLB's outstanding discount notes rose to a record $311 billion in the first three quarters, the most since 2001, according to data compiled by Zurich-based Credit Suisse Group.

Government Ties
FHLB loans probably will continue to grow in the next few months, though at a slower rate than during August and September, said Margaret Kerins, an agency debt strategist at RBS Greenwich Capital in Greenwich, Connecticut.

``Each day we seem to have new financial institutions announcing losses and so this probably isn't over,'' she said.

The home loan banks can lend at below-market rates because their government charter enables them to borrow more cheaply than other financial institutions. The ties to the government suggest the U.S. will bail them out in times of trouble.

The system sold $3 billion of two-year notes on Oct. 26 at a yield of 4.26 percent, or 46 basis points more than Treasuries of similar maturity. Stamford, Connecticut-based General Electric Co., also rated AAA, has $1 billion of notes due a month later that yield 4.6 percent.

Syndicated Global Bond Distribution
For bullet issues –September 1, 2006
thru October 5, 2007

> I would like to see which central bank is buying....

> Ich würde gerne wissen welche Zentralbank da kauft......

Some lawmakers said they are concerned the FHLBs are taking on too much debt after they were unable to account properly for their own risks.

Stricter Oversight?
Five of the banks, including the Atlanta and Pittsburgh branches, restated earnings from 2001 through 2004, while the Chicago and Topeka branches corrected mistakes from 2001 through 2003. All of them fixed accounting errors for financial contracts used to protect against swings in interest rates.

The mistakes at the home loan banks, as well as those at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, prompted Republican lawmakers to spend the past four years pushing for legislation to create a tougher regulator for the government-chartered enterprises. While the House passed legislation in May, the Senate Banking Committee has yet to do so.

The failure to create new laws ``is predicting disaster,'' Baker, a Republican on the financial services panel, said in an interview. The FHLBs ``have the potential for adverse economic impact if not properly administered,'' he said.

No Losses
The banks require borrowers to put up mortgages, mortgage bonds and other assets as collateral. None has experienced ``a credit loss on an advance to a member, ever,'' Ronald Rosenfeld, chairman of the Federal Housing Finance Board, the Washington- based regulator of the FHLBs, said in an e-mail.

The New York bank looks at detailed data on each asset when deciding how much to extend against it and doesn't accept delinquent loans or non-AAA rated bonds as collateral, Paul Heroux, its head of member services said in an interview.

``The home loan banks are extremely low-risk institutions,'' Allan Mendelowitz, one of five directors of the Federal Housing Finance Board, said in an interview. ``There is probably no contingent risk to the taxpayer.''

Investors said the same about mortgage securities, which had home loans as collateral and were given top AAA ratings by S&P and Moody's. Then defaults soared for loans to people with poor credit and some securities fell as much as 80 cents on the dollar.

A collapse would create ``tremendous pressure to have the taxpayer bear the cost of a bailout,'' said Representative Ed Royce, a Republican from California on the House Financial Services Committee.

Maturing Debt
The FHLBs have $276 billion of bonds maturing in 2008 and $174 billion in 2009, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The system last week began to refinance about $144 billion of its so-called discount notes sold in August and September with maturities ranging from eight to 12 weeks, FTN's Vogel said.

Borrowing from the system during that period was probably a record for a two-month span, Vogel said. The FHLBs disclose their borrowing at the end of each quarter.

Calabasas, California-based Countrywide, the largest U.S. mortgage lender, almost doubled borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta to $51 billion during the quarter, the company said in a statement last week.

Countrywide began to use the FHLBs in August as analysts at New York-based Merrill Lynch & Co. raised the possibility that the company could go bankrupt after it had trouble raising funds in the commercial paper market. Countrywide later sold a $2 billion stake to Charlotte, North Carolina-based Bank of America Corp., the second-biggest in the U.S. after Citigroup.

Out of Business?
``You don't want to use the phrase `going out of business' in the press, but they would be in a much, much worse liquidity position if they didn't have the Federal Home Loan Bank system sitting out there,'' said Paul Miller, an analyst at Friedman Billings Ramsey Group Inc., a securities firm in Arlington, Virginia.

Washington Mutual, the largest U.S. savings and loan, boosted its borrowing from the FHLBs by $31 billion, the company said this month.

The Seattle-based lender's ``funding flexibility'' put it in ``a much stronger position to withstand the market disruptions of the third quarter,'' Chief Financial Officer Thomas Casey said on a Oct. 17 conference call with investors. Washington Mutual spokeswoman Libby Hutchinson declined to comment further.

Paramus, New Jersey-based Hudson City Bancorp, the third- largest thrift in the U.S., borrowed $800 million from the FHLBs in the third quarter, 25 percent more than a year earlier, said Chief Executive Officer Ronald Hermance.

``Even AAA rated credits were having a tough time issuing paper,'' Hermance said. ``It took everybody back to the Federal Home Loan Banks.''

AddThis Feed Button

Monday, October 22, 2007

NAV SIVs

No wonder Paulson & Co are working overtime.......

Kein Wunder das Paulson & Co momentan sehr beschäftigt sind........

FT The point of M-LEC
Since SIVs were last in the limelight, things have not improved. In fact, asset prices in SIVs have continued to slide. Take a look at this graph, published by Fitch ratings in a note to clients:

Net Asset Value, or NAV, is a measure of the amount by which the market value of a SIVs portfolio exceeds the senior debt, divided by the capital - in other words, a measure of a SIVs underlying worth after leverage.

Not only does Fitch’s graph highlight that SIV’s fortunes have steadily worsened, it also points to a growing divide. Some SIVs are in a far worse NAV situation than others. Axon Financial, managed by TPC-Axon Capital Management, has a NAV currently at 35-40 per cent. Compare to AbAcAs Investments, managed by EBI/NSM. Its net asset value (NAV) is at around 100-105 per cent.

Even if funding briefly loosened up after August, SIV NAVs are still clearly troubled.

Citi - the prime mover behind M-LEC, is a case in point. While the bank could last week declare it had funding for all its SIV CP for the next year, it couldn’t rest on its laurels: The 3 Citi SIVs Fitch rates (in total there are 7) have seen NAVs slide pretty much in line with Fitch’s graph. On September 6, Beta’s NAV was 85.3 per cent, Five’s NAV was 81.6 per cent and Sedna’s NAV was 81 per cent. One month later, on October 8, Fitch puts Beta at 75-80 per cent, Five at 70-75 per cent and Sedna at 75-80 per cent. A decline of up to 10 per cent.

>Mish is asking in Enron Accounting at Citigroup

If a fire sale of those SIVs and conduits resulted in a 25% loss, Citigroup would have net tangible assets of $25.5 billion. If a fire sale of SIVs and conduits resulted in a 41% loss in those SIVs and conduits, Citigroup would have zero net tangible assets.

M-LEC is not only about restoring confidence and making the market more transparent. It’s about restoring asset values.

> Hellasious from Sudden Debt has a related post that is also painting a very bleak picture

> Hellasious von Sudden Debt hat ebenfalls ein Post zu diesem Thema das wenig Linderung verspricht

Hat Tip Eh

AddThis Feed Button

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

Cheyne SIV fails insolvency tests

I think lots of people are hoping that the ruling (see emphasized part of the post) won´t spread...... If you want to laugh or to shake your head in disbelief click here and read what S&P has to say about conduits and SIV just a few month ago.....

Ich kann mir sehr gut vorstellen das wohl einige den unterstrichenen Absatz basierend auf dem Richterspruch nicht sonderlich gerne sehen......Wenn Ihr ordentlich ablachen oder einfach nur fassungslos den Kopf schütteln wollt kann ich diesen Kommentar von S&P zum Thema "Conduits und SIV´s" empfehlen.....

Thanks to Jim Borgman

Cheyne Finance halts payment / FT
Cheyne Finance has become the first structured investment vehicle to stop repaying its short-term debt after the administrator of the troubled fund won court backing to declare it in breach of insolvency tests.


The move came as Cheyne Finance entered final negotiations with four banks bidding for its assets, which stood at $6.6bn (£3.2bn) at the start of last month.

The hold on repayments of the SIV’s commercial paper will hit short-term debt markets just as they had begun to show some signs of recovery from the ravages of the summer credit squeeze.

But Neville Kahn, a partner at Deloitte, the administrator, said the insolvency would not force it to sell assets at firesale prices and would make it easier to push through a sale.

“It will mean that we will get to a solution quicker,” he said. “We hope to have a recommended deal very shortly to communicate to creditors.”

The SIV still has $1.3bn of cash and could have continued to repay maturing commercial paper until at least the end of this month.

The administrator won backing from the High Court in a sealed judgment on Wednesday, said people present at the hearing.

However, the court’s interpretation of the insolvency test – using a balance sheet measure, in spite of the SIV’s cash pile – could prove controversial, as many SIVs would be insolvent if a similar measure was applied.

Mr Kahn refused to say which banks were bidding or at what prices, but said it was wrong to assume the holders of mezzanine debt – the lowest-rated tranche – would be wiped out.

That suggests holders of the top-rated commercial paper will be repaid in full, in spite of the insolvency.

Cheyne Finance, set up and managed by Cheyne Capital, the $12bn London hedge fund, is one of several vehicles either struggling to find new financial backers to support a restructuring or have triggered restrictions on their operations.

Two SIV-lites struggling to restructure have turned to Barclays for support, although Golden Key, set up by Swiss-run hedge fund Avendis, is in dispute with the bank about whether it has to repay a loan it drew down, reported to be worth $250m. Mainsail II, an SIV-lite run by London hedge fund Solent, had a rescue plan backed by Barclays turned down by investors.

In total, more than $42bn of assets in SIVs and SIV-lites are facing limits on their operations.
AddThis Feed Button

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

US banks take $280bn onto books

Despite all the orchestrated efforts around the globe from central banks, regulators, politicians etc. the party or orgy :-) is over. The cracks are so obvious that no matter what kind of "bailout" attempt will happen next the real economy will take a significant hit. The times of easy credit are over. I think the biggest fear now is that the creditors will overshoot to the other side. The fact that foreigners are less willing to finance US assets will intensify this trend. I also recommend the excellent piece from Brad Setser The US trade deficit is falling, but not as fast as the world’s demand for US debt.

Trotz der konzertierten weltweiten Aktionen von den Zentralbanken, Aufsichtsbehörden, Politikern etc sind die Zeichen nicht zu übersehen das die Party oder Orgie :-) zu Ende ist. Die Einschläge sind so massiv das ganz egal was noch an neuen "Bailout" Versuchen auf die Agenda kommt die reale Wirtschaft darunter zu leiden haben wird. Die Zeiten des einfachen Zugangs zum Kreditmarkt sind Geschichte. Die größte Sorge die momentan vorherrscht ist sicher das die Kreditgeber von einem Extrem ins andere wechseln und es den Zugang über Gebühr erschweren. Die Tatsache das ausgerechnet jetzt die Ausländer aufwachen und immer weniger US Anleihen erwerben wird diesen Trend nur noch verstärken. Zu diesem Thema solltet ihr ebenfalls die Meinung von Brad Setser lesen The US trade deficit is falling, but not as fast as the world’s demand for US debt.

Big US commercial banks have seen $280bn of new debt come on to their balance sheets since the credit squeeze, threatening to undermine economic growth by inhibiting their ability to make new loans.

The banks have been forced to take on to their books large amounts of commercial paper and leveraged loans after investor demand for such assets dried up in the summer.

David Rosenberg, economist at Merrill Lynch, said that this amount had risen to $280bn since the start of August.

He added that according to data from the Federal Reserve, large bank capital – represented by net assets – had declined by $40bn since the beginning of August. “This has never happened before over such a short timeframe and this is rather serious because such a steep and sudden compression in large-bank capital has the potential to create a negative lending environment,” he said.

If left unchecked, this could “significantly inhibit” economic growth, he added.
> via Minyanville The Bernanke Put Defined

"Access to a backstop source of liquidity in turn reduces the incentives of banks to limit the credit they provide to their customers and counterparties."

Read that statement carefully. It's the one key sentence in the entire speech.

The misunderstanding that is perpetuated is that the Fed by "providing liquidity" is not actually "providing credit."

What Bernanke's statement means is that, in reality, the two are synonymous.

European banks are facing similar pressures with many observers expressing concern at the ability of some smaller lenders to handle the potential strain on their balance sheets.

Fears over the effect of the credit squeeze on US bank balance sheets was one factor behind the US Treasury’s encouragement of the creation of a "super fund" to take on the assets of troubled investment vehicles.

The three top US banks – Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America – this week unveiled plans for a fund that would buy up to $100bn of mortgage-backed assets from structured investment vehicles.

Citigroup, which manages $80bn of assets in such vehicles, has bought some of the vehicles’ commercial paper.
On Monday, Citi said it was suspending share buy-backs because its capital ratios had weakened partly due to the large amount of commercial paper and leveraged loans it had taken on.

According to Moody’s, the credit rating agency, assets held by bank-sponsored special investment vehicles fell to $320bn from $395bn in July.

“The large banks have been forced to take commercial paper back on their balance sheets and as a result are choking on assets they did not plan on having – thereby tying up regulatory capital and in turn possibly leading to a reduction in credit extension,” said Mr Rosenberg.

He pointed out that 30 per cent of the growth in the debt that US households took on was backed by asset-backed investors.

AddThis Feed Button

Sunday, October 14, 2007

Master Liquidity Enhancement Conduit / SIV & Conduit Bailout

It looks like the big players, the Treasury Department & the Fed have found a way to hold on to their off balance sheet addiction. Although the details are not clear yet i can´t help myself but whenever i hear "Big Banks" & Treasury Department and the Fed in one sentence it doesn´t smell like more transparency is on the way ....

Es sieht einmal mehr danach aus als wenn die großen Banken Hand in Hand mit dem Finanzministerium und der Fed Überstunden geschoben haben um auf jeden Fall zu verhindern das die bisherigen Off Balance Sheet Verbindlichkeiten in die eigene Bilanz aufgenommen werden müssen. Ich muß zugeben das immer wenn ich Banken, Finanzministerium und die Fed in einem Satz zu lesen bekomme es nicht zu Unrecht zu befürchten steht das die eh schon dürftige Transparenz noch mehr Schaden nimmt ...

And thanks to Aaron Krowne we know of some small print that is already in place to prop up these vehicles....

Und dank Aaron Krowne erfahren wir auch das die Fed bereits jetzt fleißig diese Konstruktionen ausserhalb der Bilanz auf eine Art und Weise fördert das es einem dem Atem verschlagen muß.......

Is The Fed Flushing Out The “Excess Credit” Demons?

With this in mind, those generally suspicious of the Fed might not be surprised to find out that the Bernanke bunch is busy suspending even more reserve requirements for many major banks amidst this credit crisis.

Specifically here I am referring to bank off-balance-sheet conduit subsidiaries (this is now how money market and similar vehicles are handled… which is a sketchy fact in and of itself). The Fed is apparently piling up exceptions to its regulation 23A, which normally mandates 10% reserves for such conduit entities.

The exceptions “temporarily” suspend these reserve requirements. They are open-ended. Hmmm.

One would think in a time of financial crisis that the monetary authorities would be increasing capitalization requirements. Not so in the bizarro-world of the US Fed — maintaining the con a little longer is top priority

Here the reports / Hier die Berichte

Citigroup, Bank of America Agree to Set Up $80 Billion CP Fund / Bloomberg

Banks to Start Fund to Protect Credit Market / NYT

Banks line up $75bn mortgage debt fund / FT

Rescue Readied By Banks Is Bet To Spur Market / WSJ

Here are other takes / Hier andere Meinungen

Mish Super SIVs - A Fraudulent Attempt at Concealment

Nacked Capitalism The Smoke and Mirrors SIV Rescue Plan

Zeitenwende Wall-Street plant Notfall-Fonds

Calculated Risk Musical SIVs

WSJ Deal Journal A Bailout for Citigroup?

Lee Adler The Worst Is Over ?

WSJ Opinion House of Paulson?

Paul Kasriel MLEC - Trying to Turn a Sows Ear into a Silk Purse?

Calculated Risk Institutional Risk Analytics on MLEC


AddThis Feed Button